Hey y’all!

It’s my favorite time of the month! So you know what that means: “UNBOSSED AND UNBOTHERED w/ D. Rashaan” (Episode #8) airs LIVE in just a couple of hours.

It’s really going to be a very compelling hour. We’ll visit with friends of beloved local LGBTQ community member, Ta’Ron Carson aka “Rio”, who was recently gunned down just across the street from our studios in Midtown Kansas City. The mother of Ta’Ron, Monique Carson, and other family members will join us for an intimate look at his life and the culture of love and acceptance that allowed him to flourish as a Black gay man.

As always, I’ll be #ReclaimingMyTime and in this installment, I want to talk about the importance of what I like to call “Radical Self-Care.” Sometimes you’ve just gotta shut the whole world out and focus on yourself. I’ll tell how — and why — I did it and how you can too!

Our featured artist is none other than one of all of our favorites, Aida Ade, via her debut album, “Soundwheel.”

I invite you to catch the live broadcast at 1:00 PM Central Standard Time. Here’s how:

1. You can find me on local radio (in Kansas City) by tuning to KKFI 90.1 FM or,

2. Listen from anywhere in the world via the internet at www.KKFI.org (just click on the big “Listen Now” button in the upper right hand corner), or

3. Via Facebook Live!

The call-in number is: (816) 931-5534 and I definitely want to hear from you.

One day, someone will make a truly good movie based on a video game. We’re still waiting. Oscar-winning actress Alicia Vikander is the latest to log in for a paycheck. “Tomb Raider” reboots the old Angelina Jolie franchise and the results are loud, busy and mind numbing. The so-so special effects are a distraction and it lacks the humor that makes its obvious inspiration, “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” a classic. Vikander is good, but the filmmakers work hard to set up a sequel, which, I suspect, will never happen. No 1-up for “Tomb Raider.”

“Love, Simon” isn’t perfect, either, but why nitpick? In this comic coming of age film based on a popular YA novel, Nick Robinson plays a closeted gay teen who makes some bad choices to prevent people from discovering his secret. The cast, which includes Jennifer Garner and Josh Duhamel as his supportive parents, is likable and the movie has a positive spirit. It plays a bit too much like a made for TV movie, however.

It’s amazing that one of the most daring rescue operations of all time has yet to be made into a fully satisfying film. “7 Days in Entebbe” is at least the fifth attempt. Rosamund Pike and Daniel Brühl play wannabe revolutionaries who skyjack an Air France jet in 1967 and hold the 94 Israeli passengers hostage at the airport in Entebbe, Uganda. Although competently made and well acted, the movie doesn’t build sufficient tension. “7 Days” just seems like that’s how long it takes to watch.

Also opening this week, “November” is a sci-fi fantasy film from Estonia based on an acclaimed novel. “Josie” is a dark film noir thriller starring Sophie Turner and Dylan McDermott. “The Young Karl Marx” is a biopic about the early days of the famed socialist thinker.

Hedy Lamarr was a glamorous Hollywood star of the 1940s and 50s. Often cited as the most beautiful woman in the world, she’s probably best known for the Cecil B. DeMille classic, “Samson and Delilah.” She had a unusual secret. She was also a brilliant inventor who developed ‘frequency hopping’ technology and donated it to the US military during WWII, never receiving a dime. That technology enables cell phones, bluetooth, wi-fi…an industry worth $64 billion today. It’s a story stranger than fiction.

Today we’d like to welcome to the show Raven Oak. Award-winning and bestselling speculative fiction author Raven Oak is best known for Amaskan’s Blood, Class-M Exile, and the collection Joy to the Worlds: Mysterious Speculative Fiction for the Holidays. She studied English literature, music composition, and computers in college, and graduated with a Bachelor of Science from the University of North Texas and her Master of Science Degree in CECS. After twelve years in the classroom as a computer and English teacher, she retired from education to pursue writing full-time.

We’ll be asking her about her life, opinions, and about writing in a traditionally male-dominated field.

Join us at 3pm Central time on 90.1FM, streaming on kkfi.org, or via various apps on your phones!

Every Woman – 20180127 – Raven Oak
Episode date : January 27, 2018
On Every Woman

Today is the day for the majority of the Women’s Marches for 2018.
We will discuss the women’s marches and have some recordings from the Lawrence march.

Join us at 3pm Central time on 90.1FM, streaming on kkfi.org, or via various apps on your phones!

Lillian Faderman, internationally renowned author and scholar, joins author Lynn Ames, Cheryl Pletcher, and host Elizabeth Andersen on The Sandra Moran Radio Book Club to discuss Lillian’s The Gay Revolution. Anyone who studies or wants to learn about LGBTQ history should read this landmark book.

Trump-Kim Summit a Breakthrough or Prelude to Disaster?

Interview with Tim Shorrock, journalist and author of the book, “Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing”, conducted by Scott Harris

After a year of trading threats and insults with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, U.S. President Donald Trump accepted Kim’s invitation for a face-to-face meeting by the end of May. In extending the invitation for a summit meeting, North Korea committed to a temporary halt to its nuclear and missile tests, even during scheduled joint U.S.–South Korean military exercises in April.

A diplomatic initiative by South Korea’s president Moon Jae-in succeeded in reducing tensions, when the North agreed to participate in the South’s Olympic Winter Games in February, setting the stage for the Trump–Kim summit. Until last week, such a meeting seemed impossible, with Trump mocking Kim as “little Rocket Man,” and repeated threats to launch a preemptive military strike against North Korea and imposition of harsh sanctions. Trump’s direct threat to “totally destroy North Korea,” implying a U.S. nuclear attack, alarmed the world.

Despite hope for a successful summit, there’s concern that with little time for preparation, and the sudden firing of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Trump’s meeting with Kim Jong Un could end in failure, further escalating tensions. Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Tim Shorrock, a Washington-based journalist who spent part of his youth living in South Korea. Here, he assesses the chance for successful summit, and the opportunities and dangers of the planned meeting between Trump and Kim Jong Un. [Rush transcript.]
TIM SCHORROCK: I think it’s very important that there’s going to be this face-to-face meeting and of course, it’s going to take some effort of diplomacy to line things up before the meeting. But I think it’s very possible, and I also think there’s absolutely been a lot of backdoor discussions for the last year, even though there hasn’t been much publicly said about that.

BETWEEN THE LINES: Tim, what are the concessions that North Korea has made here in order to get a positive response for this invitation they’ve made to President Trump?

TIM SCHORROCK: Well, first of all, apparently they’ve said they’re willing to discuss eventual de-nuclearization. I mean, that’s key to this with the U.S. and that was a major concession, because they’ve said previously that they would negotiate around their nuclear capabilities only after the U.S. had ended what they call its “hostile policy”, which is a formula they’ve put forward many times. And by hostile policy, they mean these military exercises which take place twice a year. They mean the nuclear threats against North Korea, which of course, the U.S. has plenty of nuclear weapons aimed at North Korea and has had them aimed at North Korea for decades.

And, also ending the sanctions and the embargo on North Korea, which they see also as a hostile act. And so, by saying that eventually they’ll talk about denuclearization, that’s a major concession right there. And then, they told the South Korean delegation they understand why the U.S. and South Korea hold these exercises and they would not make a big issue out of the exercises when they start up again in March. But I think their understanding, and the South Korean understanding is that these exercises will happen, but they’ll be much more scaled down than in the past. And in particular, these exercises won’t include training in what the U.S. and South Korea have previously called “decapitation teams” that would be sent into North Korea during a war to eliminate the leadership, assassinate Kim Jung Un.

And in the past two years, they’ve actually had teams that were running through these exercises practicing that very act. And then of course, they would train in nuclear attack on North Korea and that kind of thing in these exercises. So, you know, according to reliable reports from the South Korean press, those exercises are going to take place absent U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, as well as nuclear submarines and nuclear-armed submarines and then those ships and vessels will not participate. So that’s the concession that I think the United States is not talking about.

BETWEEN THE LINES: Well Tim, I wanted to ask you about the specter of failure here. I think pretty much everyone here in this country and around the world hopes for a successful outcome of this meeting between President Trump and Kim Jong Un, and success for a peaceful resolution of the long-standing conflict on the Korea peninsula. But what are the dangers of failure here if President Trump goes to this meeting with Kim Jong Un and they can’t agree on much? Donald Trump is known as a very vindictive man, and we’ve seen in the past his penchant for getting even. When it comes to a nuclear confrontation that kind of posturing is extremely dangerous. What are you concerned about if there is a failure at the negotiating table?

TIM SCHORROCK: I think you’re right about that. I mean, I think there are definitely dangers and risks here. But the fact is South Korea is going to be very involved these negotiations, even the bilateral. And (South Korean President) Moon (Jae-in)’s idea is to have kind of consecutive parallel negotiations that are U.S.-North Korea, South Korea-North Korea, and other countries in the region together with North Korea. So there will be an international settlement. And as more countries get involved – not necessarily in pressuring North Korea, like Trump has been trying to do – but in trying to find a regional solution to this. And I think there’s dangers, but I think there could be a huge leap, there could be a huge deal.

I mean, imagine, a peace agreement to end the Korean war. It would end 60-70 years of war. If you talk to people in Korea, they’ve been saying for months they’re much more worried about what Trump will do, than Kim Jong Un. But what they were very worried about, and what President Moon Jae-in was very worried about, was the U.S. taking unilateral action – unilateral military action against North Korea – that of course would spill over into South Korea and could become a major war within hours.

You know, it’s a divided country in the south. Koreans, while they want to defend their land from any kind of invasion, they don’t want to have a war that kills hundreds of thousands because of some unilateral decision made by the United States to destroy North Korea’s nuclear program.

For more information, visit Tim Shorrock’s Nation Magazine page at thenation.com/authors/tim-shorrock; Tim Shorrock’s web site at timshorrock.com and on Twitter @TimothyS.

Clearing Hurdle, Children’s Lawsuit Puts Federal Government on Trial for Climate Change Inaction

Interview with Jacob Lebel, Our Children’s Trust climate change lawsuit plaintiff, conducted by Melinda Tuhus

On March 7, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a historic generational lawsuit charging that the U.S. government failed to take sufficient action to address climate change, can go to trial. The 21 plaintiffs were 7 to 18 years old at the time the suit was filed by Our Children’s Trust in 2015.

With this unanimous ruling denying the Trump administration’s motion to dismiss the case, the suit is now cleared for trial in federal district court in Eugene, Oregon. The litigation charges that the United States government “has violated the youngest generation’s constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property, as well as failed to protect essential public trust resources.” The case rests on a principle called the “the public trust doctrine,” which says that the government has a responsibility to safeguard certain public assets—in this case, a stable climate. In an earlier decision which favored the youth plaintiffs, district court Judge Ann Aiken wrote, “Exercising my ‘reasoned judgment,’ I have no doubt that the right to a climate system capable of sustaining human life is fundamental to a free and ordered society.”

Between The Lines’ Melinda Tuhus spoke with Jacob Lebel, one of the original plaintiffs, who’s now 21 years old. Here Lebel, who lives on a farm in southern Oregon, explains the legal challenges and outcomes, and what he and his fellow plaintiffs hope to win. [Rush transcript.]
JACOB LEBEL: So that decision by Judge Aiken was the major decision that we got; that was the question of standing: “Do we have legal standing to bring that case?” That’s where a lot of environmental cases actually fail. And we actually won that. Judge Ann Aiken of the Eugene, (Oregon) federal district court ruled that we do have standing and we can bring this case to trial. And then what happened is that the Trump administration filed with the Ninth Circuit, and it’s an obscure piece of legalese called the writ of mandamus – rarely used, it’s a desperate measure, kind of a last resort tactic. Basically, they were asking that the case not go to trial and go straight up to the Ninth Circuit court, have the Ninth Circuit immediately review the lower court’s decision, which, if you know about legal matters, is highly unusual, because the Ninth Circuit is the appellate court, and it’s supposed to overview the decision by the lower court once you’ve gone through the discovery process and gone through trial.

It’s not its job to oversee discovery or trial or whatever, it’s just supposed to review the findings once the case is developed. So we weren’t even getting the chance to develop the case and go to trial if the Trump administration had its way. What happened is the Ninth Circuit said, “Okay, we’ll review it and let you know if you can continue to trial in the lower court or we’re going to step in.” And that took a while, and we just got the decision that we got the go-ahead to go to trial, and we’re back in the district court where we should be, and we’re going to trial. But there was a delay there, and we actually went to San Francisco and had oral arguments before the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, the three-judge panel.

BETWEEN THE LINES: I know this case was originally filed against President Obama and his administration, and after Trump took office, I was in D.C. when the youth plaintiffs appeared at the U.S. Supreme Court to change the name of the suit from Juliana v Obama to Juliana v Trump, Kelsey Juliana being the lead plaintiff. Who are you expecting to have testify?

JACOB LEBEL: The case is really about the U.S. government, it’s not about particular individuals. That’s kind of the beauty of our case, in a way. I think we do need efforts targeting particular companies, agencies or individuals who are corrupt and are horribly worsening the situation for their own profit. That is great. What our case is doing is trying to achieve systemic change through the legal system, so we’re addressing decades of willful action by the U.S. government to worsen this problem of climate change by creating this fossil fuel-dependent energy system. So it’s not about Obama or Trump. That’s my first point.

However, it’s kind of striking and dramatic; I don’t know if it’s poetic justice or whatever, that Trump is one of the most – as far as fossil fuels and corruption and climate change goes – is one of the most horrific politicians that we’ve ever had in power. So if we win, it’s very fitting I think, that we’re fighting the Trump administration. There’s no ambiguity there about what the moral stakes or values are on both sides, I’d say. We’re suing all the major agencies – Department of the Interior, Department of Energy, EPA, the White House – so they’re all in there, and it all depends on what information we really need that we can’t get otherwise. I’ll say that we were trying to depose Rex Tillerson —

BETWEEN THE LINES: In his capacity as head of Exxon Mobil, right, before he became Trump’s Secretary of State.

JACOB LEBEL: All the major companies had actually filed to intervene in our case.

BETWEEN THE LINES: And after Trump took office, the companies asked to withdraw, right, so they couldn’t be deposed…

JACOB LEBEL: Yeah, they withdrew because once you enter a legal case, you can get deposed; so they basically got in to throw us out, because they thought this would be a small, easy to throw-out lawsuit, and I was in court all the times and they completely got shut down by the judges, and then the case got really serious and got a lot of press, and it was moving forward and suddenly they were going to be the ones getting deposed, and that’s when they started to freak out and filed to withdraw from the case, and the judge actually let them out, which is fine because it actually simplifies the case a lot; it’s such a big case that we appreciated them not contesting the climate science in court.

Actually, the Trump administration right now as far as the legal front goes, is not contesting the facts of climate change. Right before the Obama administration left, literally a month before, filed a document that agreed with all our assertions on the climate science, actually saying it was going to be worse in some cases than our lawyers were saying. What they disagreed on was the remedy, and the government’s historic role in that. So that’s actually factual record in court, and the Trump administration has not revoked that, and I don’t know if they still can.

BETWEEN THE LINES: What exactly is the goal of the lawsuit? What do you want to get out of it?

JACOB LEBEL: First of all, some people – I hope less people now – think there’s money involved, like money reparations or something. We’re not asking for money reparations, so that’s the first point. The second point, what we’re actually suing for is a science-based climate recovery plan. That’s the key phrase.

For more information, visit Our Children’s Trust at ourchildrenstrust.org; ourchildrenstrust.org/us/federal-lawsuit/; on Twitter @youthgov; and the Washington State Chapter at ourchildrenstrust.org/state/washington .

Uncovering the Hidden History of the NRA

Interview with Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, author of “Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment,” conducted by Scott Harris

In the wake of the mass shooting at Parkland Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that left 17 dead on Feb. 14, a bipartisan group of legislators met with President Trump at the White House to discuss the epidemic of gun violence. At the conclusion of that meeting, Trump called for legislation that would strengthen background checks, address mental illness, and spoke in support of raising the age limit for the purchase of military-style assault rifles from 18 to 21 years old. In recognizing the difficulty of passing new gun control laws, the president repeatedly accused members of his own Republican party of being “afraid of the NRA (National Rifle Association).

However, just two weeks later, after the president met with NRA officials in the Oval Office, the White House unveiled its plan to combat school shootings, which included a proposal to arm teachers, but no measure that would raise the age limit on buying assault rifles. A dramatic shift by the president, who now embraced the controversial policy positions of the NRA.

The power and influence of the NRA has long been one of the major obstacles standing in the way of passing widely supported gun control legislation in Congress. Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, author of the new book, “Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment.” Here, she discusses the hidden origins of the NRA, which has transformed from a club promoting target shooting and hunting, to an organization now identified with right-wing culture wars and white nationalism.
ROXANNE DUNBAR-ORTIZ: The National Rifle Association, which up to 1977, had been a pretty benign, kind of stupid organization for men and boys, you know of target shooting, and hunting, recreational shooting. They never, ever talked about the Second Amendment.

But a white nationals organization, kind of neo-Nazis, they were anti-Semitic, anti-black – it was in the state of Washington, out in eastern Washington, which is still a hotbed of white nationalism. This organization called the Second Amendment Foundation formed, and very specifically, about promoting the Second Amendment as a right, a way for them to arm themselves legally because they were always getting busted for having all kinds of weapons, automatic weapons and stuff. Because NRA was a membership organization, they began joining. And they got enough of a solid group together that got themselves elected and actually they took over the leadership of the organization.

BETWEEN THE LINES: What was the year that this group took over the NRA?


BETWEEN THE LINES: So today’s NRA, very different from the one that existed before the late ’70s, they seem to be very much keyed into right-wing culture wars and as you describe them, they also seem to push hot button issues related to racism and white supremacy. Tell us a little bit about today’s NRA and how you think they’ll survive in a climate where the public is becoming ever more angry and outraged at this culture which promotes the idea that the more guns, the guns the better.

ROXANNE DUNBAR-ORTIZ: Well, they succeeded a lot and their success is based not on money or bribing legislators. That’s an easy explanation and falls into the U.S. tendency of finding a culprit, a single culprit and if you can just wipe that out, everything will be okay.

But’s much scarier than that because they are a membership organization of 5 million and a lot of them are passive members – they just want the discounts and whatever. Apparently among those, you know, they’re actually losing some memberships over their radicalism, you know, it’s not something everyone wants or buys into, think they’re getting into.

But there is this core group of about a million. I’m talking about not a small conspiracy, but a mass-based organization. There’s no way any organization on the left in the United States comes anywhere near those kinds of numbers of dedicated, hardcore volunteers. They’re not being paid. They’re citizens in every congressional district in the United States and they make sure that anyone who’s elected – either on the local level – because most gun laws are state laws, even the municipal level, federal level – they’ve largely been the dedicated base that has brought Trump to the presidency and the entire Congress is afraid of them. Because all they have to do is send out the names. They watch what’s going on in Washington. And they send out alerts. They’ve become very much more effective with social media, just as other movements have.

It is a white nationalist, mass-based organization and that is why it’s so powerful. There’s no way it could be that powerful if just an organization, no matter how much money they had. And they actually don’t operate with a whole lot of money – $300 million a year is their budget. And when they give to Congress members, it’s usually like a gift, a thank you. It’s not really a contribution to their campaigns. They don’t need it. They have the Koch brothers. They have these huge, rich right-wing donors. They don’t need the NRA’s money. It’s their political base. But the evangelicals, which are the largest single voting group in the United States, are allied with the NRA.

For more information, visit “Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment” at citylights.com.

This week’s summary of under-reported news

Compiled by Bob Nixon
Prison reform in Costa Rica, focused on a specific group of women, has been a success and a model for other Latin American nations and around the world. This reform, known as “77 bis” and implemented in 2013, reduced prison terms for women who were convicted of smuggling drugs into prisons to a minimum of three to eight years, if they meet certain conditions. The new law also permits the use of alternatives to incarceration for sentences of three-years or less. The immediate result of this reform was the initial release of female prisoners which also addressed the problem of overcrowding in women’s prisons. (“Costa Rica: Could Drug-Law Reform for Women Open Door to Wider Change?” Christian Science Monitor, Feb. 13, 2018)
US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Trump administration are suing California over the state’s sanctuary laws, claiming they violate federal supremacy over immigration law. In announcing the federal lawsuit in Sacramento, Sessions exchanged verbal insults with Governor Jerry Brown and other officials. Sessions specifically called out Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf who publicly warned of pending federal immigration raids in the Bay Area. (“Trump Administration Sues California Over Immigration Laws,” New York Times, Mar. 6, 2018; “Some of the California ‘sanctuary’ Laws Targeted by Feds Could Be Vulnerable, Legal Experts Say,” Los Angeles Tomes, Mar. 8, 2018; “Jeff Sessions’ Lawsuit Is An Invitation for California to Break the Law,” Los Angeles Tomes, Mar. 8, 2018)
In a rare defeat for the National Rifle Association, Florida’s Republican Governor Rick Scott signed a new gun safety law, which imposes a 3-day waiting period on gun sales and raises the legal age to purchase a gun from 18 to 21. But the law doesn’t ban assault weapons, sought by student activist survivors of the Parkland school massacre, who marched on the state capital. The NRA is now suing to block the law. (“Florida Gun Bill: What’s in It, and What Isn’t,” New York Times

Wednesday March 14, 2018

Host/producer Maria Vasquez Boyd talks with Jennifer Nigro with Audio Reader Network, writer Jeanette Powers, and musician Pablo Sanhueza.

Jeanette Powers is an anarchist performance artist who uses poetry and art to question habitual behavior and to dismantle internalized obedience. She heads the artist-driven performing arts venue, Uptown Arts Bar, and is the founding editor of non-profit Chameleon Press. She’s published a bunch of books of poetry, including the newest: Gasconade by NightBallet Press in April 2018. She is an alumni of Osage Arts Community and serves on the board for FountainVerse, an annual small press poetry fest in Kansas City, Missouri. She can most often be found near a river with her hound dog, Olly Mas. Connect with her at jeanettepowers.com or @novel_cliche

Pablo Sanhueza & KC Latin Jazz All-Stars is celebrating their 15th year together. Sanhueza is the bandleader and plays timbales. Other bandmembers are: Evan Hoffman, congas; Trevor Smith, keys, Antonio Reyes, bass, Trevor Turla, trombone, and Daniel Dissmore, trumpet. Sanhueza is a Chilean born-and-raised Latin percussionist. Since coming to Kansas City in 1996, he has raised awareness of Latin American and Caribbean music. In recent years, Pablo has performed with Latin Jazz legends and African drumming masters including Poncho Sanches, Titos Sompa, Dave Valentin, and Bobby Watson, all of whom inspired him in his early years.

Pablo views himself as a village musician who connects with the community through live performances and relationships with youths and local institutuions. He directs Calle Vida, the “street-life band” for the KC Latin Jazz All-Stars providing grassroots dance music.

Jennifer Nigro, Coordinator of Volunteers for Audio Reader Network- The Audio-Reader Network is a reading and information service for blind, visually impaired, and print disabled individuals in Kansas and western Missouri. We read daily newspapers, magazines and best-selling books on the air and on the internet, 24 hours a day, and we offer automated newspaper readings by telephone. Services are offered free of charge to anyone in our listening area who is unable to read normal printed material.
Audio-Reader offers print-disabled persons the opportunity for greater personal independence by providing access to the printed word and visual information, via electronic media and other technologies.

Radio Reading Service
Audio-Reader’s original program is a Radio Reading Service for anyone who has difficulty reading standard printed material. Broadcasting 24 hours a day from studios at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Audio-Reader uses a large pool of volunteers to read daily and weekly newspapers, magazines and books, as well as news, interviews and other programs dealing with disability and aging issues.

Who may receive Audio-Reader?
Any person whose eyesight or physical condition make it difficult or impossible to read a newspaper or book may receive our broadcasts. There is no charge for service.

How do listeners pick up Audio-Reader?
Audio-Reader is broadcast on the subcarrier of public radio stations across Kansas and Missouri. A specially tuned radio is required to access this broadcast. The radio is loaned free of charge to all eligible individuals. Listeners receive a program guide in large print or Braille.
Established in 1971, Audio-Reader was one of the first radio reading services in the world. To find other audio information services call 800-280-5325.

Find us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/audioreader
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KUAudioReader


Recent News

KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 22 – May 28

May 23, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 22 – May 28
KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 22 – May 28

This is the KKFI Jazz Event Calendar for the week of Monday, May 22nd to Sunday, May 28th. This is shared for the benefit of jazz music lovers. Please check with the music venue to confirm details of the event. …

Read More →

KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 8 – May 14

May 6, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 8 – May 14
KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 8 – May 14

This is the KKFI Jazz Event Calendar for the week of Monday, May 8th to Sunday, May 14th. This is shared for the benefit of jazz music lovers. Please check with the music venue to confirm details of the event. …

Read More →

KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 1 – May 7

April 30, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 1 – May 7
KKFI Jazz Calendar for May 1 – May 7

This is the KKFI Jazz Event Calendar for the week of Monday, May 1st to Sunday, May 7th. This is shared for the benefit of jazz music lovers. Please check with the music venue to confirm details of the event. …

Read More →

Late Shift at the Westport Saloon: The Quivers

April 28, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on Late Shift at the Westport Saloon: The Quivers
Late Shift at the Westport Saloon: The Quivers

A couple weeks ago, the Quivers took the late shift duties at the Westport Saloon.  The uptempo garage rock vibe kept the party happening at the Saloon until quitting time.  It was a good nightcap to a busy evening that …

Read More →

KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 24 – April 30

April 24, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 24 – April 30
KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 24 – April 30

This is the KKFI Jazz Event Calendar for the week of Monday, April 24th to Sunday, April 30th. This is shared for the benefit of jazz music lovers. Please check with the music venue to confirm details of the event. …

Read More →

KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 17 – April 23

April 16, 2017 By KKFI 90.1 FM Comments Off on KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 17 – April 23
KKFI Jazz Calendar for April 17 – April 23

This is the KKFI Jazz Event Calendar for the week of Monday, April 17th to Sunday, April 23rd. This is shared for the benefit of jazz music lovers. Please check with the music venue to confirm details of the event. …

Read More →

Page 9 of 73« First...7891011...203040...Last »